Sensitivity Study Setup

Current Plan

  1. Run an idealized case with the best idealized setup for all cases

  2. If I see an improvement for these cases, see if implementing this into polar WRF would work

Idealized

Cases to run

  1. Winter 1 - February 4, 5, and 6

    • Clear winter with some cloudy patches

  2. Spring 1 - May 2, 3, and 4

    • Cloudy spring case

  3. Spring 2 - May 22, 23, and 24

    • One clear spring day

Namelist settings

The following is the physics and crm sections of the namelist.input files being used for the sensitivity study.

&physics
 seaice_threshold                    = 100,
 mp_physics                          = 50,  50, 50,
 ra_lw_physics                       = 3,  3, 3,
 ra_sw_physics                       = 3,  3, 3,
 radt                                = 1,  2, 5,
 sf_sfclay_physics                   = 1,  91, 91,
 sf_surface_physics                  = 1,  0, 0,
 bl_pbl_physics                      = 0,  0, 0,
 bldt                                = 0,  0, 0,
 cu_physics                          = 0,  0, 0,
 cudt                                = 5,  5, 5,
 isfflx                              = 1,
 ifsnow                              = 1,
 icloud                              = 1,
 num_soil_layers                     = 5,
 mp_zero_out                         = 0,
 ideal_xland                         = 2,
 fractional_seaice                   = 0,
 /

&crm
 crm_zsfc                            = 0.0,
 crm_lat                             = 81,
 crm_lon                             = 8.5,
 crm_stretch                         = 0,
 crm_num_pert_layers                 = 33,
 crm_pert_amp                        = 0.1,
 crm_init_ccn                        = 100,
 crm_lupar_opt                       = 0,
 crm_znt                             = 0.04,
 crm_emiss                           = 1.0,
 crm_thc                             = 3.,
 crm_mavail                          = 0.30,
 crm_force_opt                       = 1,
 crm_th_adv_opt                      = 1,
 crm_qv_adv_opt                      = 1,
 crm_th_rlx_opt                      = 0,
 crm_qv_rlx_opt                      = 0,
 crm_uv_rlx_opt                      = 1,
 crm_vert_adv_opt                    = 1,
 crm_wcpa_opt                        = 1,
 crm_num_force_layers                = 153,
 crm_tau_s                           = 1800,
 crm_tau_m                           = 1800,
 crm_flx_opt                         = 0,
 crm_sh_flx                          = 10,
 crm_lh_flx                          = 0,
 crm_albedo_opt                      = 1,
 crm_albedo                          = 0.81,
 crm_tsk_opt                         = 2,
 crm_tsk                             = 262,
 crm_ust_opt                         = 1,
 crm_ust                             = 0.01,
 crm_init_tke_opt                    = 0,
 crm_init_tke                        = 1.0,
 crm_morr_act_opt                    = 1,
 crm_morr_hygro_opt                  = 0,
 crm_morr_hygro                      = 0.12,
 crm_mp_nc                           = 448.62,
 crm_num_aer_layers                  = 153,
 crm_stat_opt                        = 1,
 crm_stat_sample_interval_s          = 1800.,
/

Model setup

Change the values of the USGS section of LANDUSE.TBL from the following:

SUMMER
24, 55., .95, .95, 0.1, 5., 0., 9.0e25, ‘Snow or Ice’
WINTER
24, 70., .95, .95, 0.1, 5., 0., 9.0e25, ‘Snow or Ice’

  to

SUMMER
24, 81., .95, .98, 0.001, 5., 0., 1.8e06, ‘Snow or Ice’
WINTER
24, 86., .95, .98, 0.001, 5., 0., 1.8e06, ‘Snow or Ice’

Do I need to recompile the model?

Not for modifications to the .TBL files.

I tested this by modifying the values in LANDUSE.TBL to all zero for the ‘Snow and Ice’ entry. This made the model crash as soon as it began to run, indicating that these changes did modify the model without recompilation.


Real