Reviewing Values in LANDUSE.TBL

LANDUSE.TBL is used by the land surface model to specify some variables depending on the land surface type. According to the Dudhia WRF Overview presentation [Dudhia, 2014] , the following are used:

  • VEGPARM.TB - Vegetation properties in Noah and RUC

  • SOILPARM.TBL - Soil peoperties in Noah and RUC

  • LANDUSE.TBL - Surface properties in 5-layer model [Dudhia, 1996]

We are using the following in the idealized model

  • 5-layer model (use LANDUSE.TBL)

  • USGS section (specified in namelist.input)

  • The entire time we have land use category number 24 - snow and ice

Currently for snow and ice in my idealized simulations:

Season

Albedo
\((\%)\)

Suface Moisture Availability
\((*100\%)\)

Surface Emissivity
\((\%)\)

Surface Roughness

Thermal Inertia Constant

Snow Cover Effect

Surface Heat Capacity
\((J / (m^{3} K))\)

Label

Summer

55.

.95

.95

0.1

5.

0.

9.0e25

Snow or Ice

Winter

70.

.95

.95

0.1

5.

0.

9.0e25

Snow or Ice

Preliminary observations

  1. Albedo is far too low - BUT we have defined this in the namelist so this value is not used.

  2. Surface moisture availability and emissivity could both probably be increased.

  3. Surface roughness could probably be decreased.

  4. Snow cover effects seem to be constant regardless of surface

  5. The thermal inertial constant could probably be improved, but I’m not sure what this is.

  6. Surface heat capacity could be improved.

What variables do we need? Where can we get them?

Have

  1. Albedo

    • This is already incorporated into the model

Can Calculate

  1. Surface roughness length

    • This is calculated below and is much lower than that in the table

    • This could be a good value to adjust

  2. Surface heat capacity

    • This is calculated below and is much higher than that in the table

    • I’d like to discuss this variable with Von

  3. Thermal inertia constant

    • I am struggling with calculating this, I need to do more reading to understand it

Can improve estimations

  1. Surface moisture availability

    • This is higher only in the values above water

    • The difference is small so it probably would not be a large difference

  2. Emissivity

    • Also a small difference so likely not a big change